Selections from a Puritan Diary

I recently finished “Village Life in America 1852-1872, Including the Period of the American Civil”  By Caroline Cowles Richards.  This is the published diary of a school girl growing up in Canandaigua, New York.  She was raised in a Puritan household though it seems that she attended many different denominational services.  I have included some selections below that I found interesting.  Certainly the perspective of a schoolgirl starting at 10 years old isn’t the most deep perspective but I think this book gives some color to the American Puritans.  Caroline’s family is quite pious and seem like nice enough people.  Keep in mind these are selections I found worth noting and not necessarily representative of most of the book.

23

What is interesting about this quote was the title of the book given to Caroline: “Noble Deeds of American Women”.  There is probably nothing to this but it strikes me none-the-less as interesting.

32

It is telling but unsurprising that the persecuted Puritans would celebrate another persecuted heretic.  From La Wik

” On 28 and 29 January [ 1555] he came before the commission appointed by Cardinal Pole, and was sentenced to death by Gardiner for heretically denying the Christian character of the Church of Rome and the real presence in the sacrament.”

Caroline’s grandmother had a saying “the blood of the martyrs is the seed of the church.”  This probably isn’t too far off from most Christian theology but the saying still strikes me as odd.  The focus on martyrs being the seed of the church certainly would ring true for a Puritan.  Though to me it sounds vaguely like the focus on the oppressed of the modern Cathedral.

The_Burning_of_Master_John_Rogers

36

Keep in mind this is coming from a 10 year old school girl.  The family is quite well off, but even for a rich or pious family this would be unusual in this day and age.  The idea of everyman a priest was clearly practiced in Caroline’s household.

40

Oh nothing like some good old fashion racism from an Old Book.  It warms the heart.42

Caroline rarely notes news or events, so it is surprising that the Missouri Compromise made it into her diary. Especially since she didn’t understand it’s significance.  Was this event significant to her grandfather?  Or was he simply interested in hearing about the presidents speech?

2000px-Missouri_Compromise_Line.svg

45

I certainly wish modern school teachers taught manners.48

Caroline and her sister do quite a lot of sewing.  It is a common subject in her diary.  It is clear girls in her town were quite handy at fashioning and modifying clothing.  I can understand why this skill went out of fashion a long time ago, but it is a telling generational divide.  49.5

When Caroline’s grandmother tells Caroline that she is inviting a slave to dinner Caroline and her sister bluntly tell their Grandmother that they “would rather invite white ladies.”  It is not surprising but nice to see children be a little more thedish than the modern standard.  Children are pretty racist when they are not conditioned not to be.  In addition a old slave would certainly be odd company compared to the highly literate and educated white townsfolk.  But what was is really interesting is the Grandmother’s response “…God made of one blood all the people on the face of the earth….” which seems to be a reference to Acts 17:26 “And hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation” (KJV)  This seems to be a predecessor of the denial of race.  Though worth noting is that the Grandmother does not seem to pay attention to “the bounds of their habitation.”  Certainly just as a modern progressive might claim we all bleed red, or something of the sort, being genetically related does not infer there are not valid differences or distinctions.

49

Again nothing like 1850’s racism.  Some things don’t seem to change.  50

“Heathen” well you don’t hear that word often nowadays.  This is the first of many diary entries that mention various charity or conversion missions.  It seems like representatives would travel between churches to ask for donations and volunteers.  54

Hmmmm this sounds very familiar.  Just replace a picture of a ship with a picture of a starving african child.  Though it is interesting to note they were giving a picture of the ship itself.  Not to read too much in to this, but a picture of the ship clearly draws the focus to supporting the missionaries not on the salvation of the heathens.  This could be read as status signalling for holiness or a practical measure for people more concerned with their White Christian peers.  Or it could simply be no one wanted to lug a camera across an ocean and the only picture they could take was at port in America. 76

This is about the time Prussian Style Education, especially Phds, were coming into style. Hmmmm87

KnowNothing party, byname of American Party, U.S. political party that flourished in the 1850s. The KnowNothing party was an outgrowth of the strong anti-immigrant and especially anti-Roman Catholic sentiment that started to manifest itself during the 1840s.”-Encyclopedia Britannica 

“Members, when asked about their nativist organizations, were supposed to reply that they knew nothing, hence the name. As its membership and importance grew in the 1850s, the group slowly shed its clandestine character and took the official name American Party. As a national political entity, it called for restrictions on immigration, the exclusion of the foreign-born from voting or holding public office in the United States, and for a 21-year residency requirement for citizenship.”-Encyclopedia Britannica 

know-nothing_flag1840s-nativist-flag-300x205

Note here “Native Americans” is not referring to Indians but naturalized Americans.

We see here that one of the hired help is Irish.  It is interesting that Caroline knows who about the Know Nothings at all.  While it might seem strange today to talk about problems with white immigrants, many were in fact a threat to the homogeneity of the country.  They were orders of magnitude more similar than today’s immigrants but none-the-less they were not of the original WASP stock.  The discussion of problems of white diversity are beyond the scope of this post.

97

I didn’t know that Newspapers even had a non-secular section.  116

The Grandfather is a Bostonian Puritan.  Interesting.  117

This is actually a reference to sperm oil from the sperm whale.  This was used to fuel lamps. Hehe.143

Well girls were as much trend followers as they were today ( not really surprising ) even in Puritan circles.  146

Wow!  This is quite a telling difference on the conceptions of love and marriage.  Today’s equivalent of this game would probably be he loves me he loves me not.  That clearly focuses on romantic love.  In this version “Rich man, poor man, beggar man, thief, Doctor, lawyer, merchant, chief,” the focus is on the occupation, status, wealth and character of the girls future husband.  Not only is love not even mentioned in this version the focus is all on marriage and the quality of the husband.

149

Again the word “Prejudice” might mean nothing, but it is interesting to see the POSSIBLE parallels between Cathedral memes and Puritan sermons.153

This selection is interesting both on the subjects the girls were studying and that it notes that education tends distract women from men.  Although in this case it is probably for the best that young girls are not focussed on men.  The school was a girls only school fyi.  159

Segregation.  Also I wondered what changed from wanting to only dine with White ladies for Caroline?  Maybe nothing, maybe something: hard to tell.  160

“Children obey your parents.” would be certainly out of place in a modern setting.  Especially different is the concept of obeying your parents as adults.  165

I just picked this one out because it mentioned a black man going to Liberia nothing else particularly of note.  168

From the beginning of the Civil War.169

Good old 1800’s patriotism.  Though from my perspective misguided.  170

Caroline apparently followed in the footsteps of just about everyone in her family and went to seminary school.187

Again one of the few things that she notes she read aloud to her Grandfather in her diary.  Was this particular speech important to her Grandfather?  Or did he just want to hear the president’s speech? 188

No comment.

191

Noted this selection for the wartime inflation.  231CCSgrKVUAAExDZCCCSgrGmUsAAyk-i256

I chose this section simply because it is something you wouldn’t see today.  At least not being done by the natives ( outside of Maine maybe ).

1898_SeamensChapel_VinyardHaven_MA

Come Again!

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “Selections from a Puritan Diary

  1. Pingback: This Week in Reaction (2015/04/10) | The Reactivity Place

  2. if we are to have a monarch would we not have a flag? how can a nation stand without nationalism? are you ethno-nationalist? this nation died because we lost ethno-nationalism, agree- or not?

    • I don’t pretend to have a good answer to the question of flags. I would suspect the best approach is to have the flag be representative of the king. That doesn’t mean there couldn’t necessarily also be a national flag, but it would be the flag of the government ( just the geographic area ). Would having two flags create problems? I don’t know it was really just a thought.

      Nationalism is a tricky word to define. I agree this nation did die, or at least got sick ( in prelude to death ) when we lost ethno-nationalism. Let’s look at the components of what makes a lack of ethno-nationalism bad. Firstly mass-immigration, secondly mass heterogeneous immigration, entho-masochism, ethnic conflict, affirmative action, cities destroyed, violence etc etc. These effects of a lack of ethno-nationalism are indeed terrible, however “nationalism” isn’t going to solve many of them, mostly because 1. Nationalism is too vague and 2. Nationalism is Demotic. These problems are not mainly derive from a lack of raw raw patriotism, but a lack of good stewardship from government. The people’s minds are fickle, and it is not wise nor safe to rely on their minds to protect themselves. As it turns out with good stewardship, most people will love their nation, BUT it should not be an end in itself to promote nationalism. The government must promote stability, and this might require some sense of nation-hood, but it should always be presented in terms of being subjects together rather than modern nationalism.

      To summarize, ethno-nationalism is the thing which happens when people are allowed their natural instincts under the stewardship of good governance. It does not need to be fostered, supported or fuelled. We need better stewardship and the rest will come with it.

      I am not saying you or anyone else shouldn’t promote people to pursue their people’s self interest. In the modern environment we should encourage as many whites as possible to be more tribal, or ethnically centered. The effectiveness of this may vary, however keep in mind you are not converting people into being a Nazi, you are simply unleashing what would be their natural thought processes in a sane world.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s